She Chose to Sleep with 500+ Men and People Defended Her...

A Harsh Response to the Many Verbose Bumbling Idiots in My Comments.

Sometimes I love the fact that most people are so painfully predictable.

Sometimes I loathe the fact that they are and I’m baffled at how remarkably stupid and hive minded some of those dumb fucks are.

I mean that. When people in the comments repeated the same counterargument again and again, it just made it easier for me to pick apart.

The other month, I dropped an article about a woman who slept with so many men that she went to the hospital. I’m still a little shocked that I even had the material to write such an article.

But I was shocked so many women defended her and made excuses for someone in their 20s who WILLINGLY MADE THE CHOICE ALL BY HERSELF. And yet still, pathetic little reprobates made excuses, and some even defended her. At this point, calling it ‘self-sabotage’ is generous. It’s more like strapping a grenade to your ego and blaming the patriarchy for pulling the pin.

Annie Knight wasn’t groomed. She wasn’t coerced. She just thought she'd ride the clout train and now wants a refund on public opinion. I mean, she gets off on the attention. Look at this…

The most annoying part? There’s always a group of enablers holding the receipt, standing in a ready-made jerk circle and dying to defend whatever honor she might have left.

This is how far we’ve gotten, this is how much the pendulum has shifted, and this is how much women will always be afforded excuses for the terrible decisions they keep making.

Other women rarely, if ever, hold other women accountable, and I find it bizarre.

Here are some of the “Greastest hits” of Comments.

Even Though This Was Her Event, They Still Kept Blaming the Men.

This argument is always hilarious to me. A woman could murder 40 people with a gun and someone would say, “well men do it more” Or they’d say some shit like. “Men created guns”.

Listen up motherfuckers, if I write an article about what some women are willingly choosing to do to exploit themselves sexually. The men are a moot point, especially cause it’s like “duh of course the men showing up are just as scummy”. But they’re not the subject matter. It’s this really annoying logical fallacy called whataboutism, which has become a deflection tactic used to avoid responsibility for the choices women make or scrutiny by shifting attention elsewhere.

Cheap, tawdry, archaic, and old.

So when a woman does something objectively harmful, exploitative, or immoral, some people often defenders of ideology (fucking 500 men I guess), not logic, will deflect accountability by saying

• “Well, men do it more.”

• “Men were there”

• “If men didn’t show up, she couldn’t do it!”

Or even worse:

“Men created the systems/tools that made it possible.”

These replies don’t refute the behavior being discussed; it’s just a weird distraction. It’s like saying…

“Don’t talk about her robbing a bank, because men commit more robberies.”

This moral sleight of hand is designed to shut down uncomfortable truths rather than confront them. And it’s cowardly, a move people use on the internet when people can’t see past their biases. A woman could unload a clip on 40 people, and some jabronie would still mumble,

“Well… statistically, men do it more.”

Or they’ll reach so far into the nonsense jar they pull out their dirty ass cheeks, masquerading limp ideology wearing clown shoes. If I’m writing about how some women CHOOSE to exploit themselves sexually, don’t throw a smoke grenade labeled “men” and hope the conversation disappears.

Not every critique is a comparison. And if your first reaction is to look away or point fingers, maybe you’re not ready for the reflection. Accountability isn’t a competition; it’s a mirror that reflects on where our society currently is. Respectable men aren’t buying this content. It’s the most perverse, anonymous, and emotionally bankrupt men who are fueling this “empowerment economy.” So stop name-dropping our gender as if all 4 billion of us showed up to bang this random chick.

The truest equality means we judge actions, not chromosomes. Empowerment without accountability is just self-worship in drag.

Oh, Bryana. The sheer irony of you defending a woman’s right to attention-seeking via an Olympic-grade sex marathon by blaming “the patriarchy’s rabid appetite for penetration” is…chef’s kiss. I applaud the NPC's automatic move to “cause patriarchy”.

If a man slept with 50 women in a week and posted a video crying for validation, you’d be first in line with the pitchforks labeled “toxic masculinity”. But slap a ring light on a woman doing it, and suddenly it’s a sociology thesis on how men are to blame for female attention and porn addiction?

I think some would call this misguided absolution by projection.

And no, this isn't some Freudian "male-driven narrative." It's called individual responsibility.

Try it sometime. You might like it.

You’re not oppressed if you’re monetizing the system with your whole chest while blaming it in the same breath. Capitalism in booty shorts.

Keep moralizing in lowercase while the rest of us shovel through this circus.

Of Course, You Have The “White Knight Men.”

Here to save the day and show the women that “you’re one of the good ones”. By calling me out for having an opinion that doesn’t match their worldview. How stunning and brave.

Yeah you can fuck off, too. I’m not taking prisoners today. These men piss me off.

I always go back to this…

Ah, Quentin. The brave man standing shirtless in the rain, apologizing on behalf of an entire gender like you personally invented Pornhub in your garage.

This performative knob jockey said…

“Pornography was made by men for men’s pleasure.”

So was the internet. And plumbing. And insulin. Should we apologize for those, too, or is this just selective guilt cosplay for clout? You say “that shit is totally on us” as if women are just unwilling participants dragged into porn sets like hostages.

It’s 2025, you daft cunt.

Have you ever met a cam girl on OnlyFans? They’re not exactly being held at sword point they’re the ones holding the fucking ring light.

And here's his “mic drop”.

“They are as misogynistic as the ones blaming them.”

A woman films herself degrading herself for cash = internalized misogyny.
A man questions if that might be a cultural problem = externalized misogyny.

Translation…

Everyone’s misogynistic… except you.

You’re the enlightened middleman, the Male Feminist Oracle. Like, c’mon man. How do you people take such performative court jesters seriously? If you spent half as much time encouraging dignity as you do apologizing for things you didn’t invent, we might actually get somewhere.

Porn isn't misogyny, it’s commerce, it’s business.

A supply-demand feedback loop fueled by human nature and technological convenience. Trying to guilt-trip men for consuming it while ignoring the women monetizing it is like blaming fat people for fast food while praising McDonald's for empowering fry cooks.

But sure, Quentin. Keep flogging yourself publicly like you’re auditioning for Woke Superman.

Pathetic.

Why Are Women Not Accountable?

Because most women are rewarded for ardent self-destruction.

And I get it. That sounds like a harsh generalization. It feels unfair. But stick with me, because if you're a man who's been married, divorced, ghosted, or gaslit, you’ve probably felt this truth in your bones.

The gap between how men and women handle responsibility isn’t just personal, it’s structural, psychological, and cultural. Women are raised to be liked, not accountable.

From childhood, boys and girls are trained differently. Boys are told to “man up,” “own your mistakes,” and “take the hit.” Girls are more often comforted, excused, or protected from conflict. Cause they’re girls. When a boy cries, he’s told he’s weak. When a girl cries, the world reshapes itself to soothe her. One becomes numb. The other becomes entitled. Both are set up to fail love, honesty, and growth.

📚 According to a 2021 study from the University of Cambridge, boys are disciplined more harshly, while girls are more likely to be offered emotional support, even when they’re at fault. It starts early within their youth and only manifests to a greater extent when they get older.

This early conditioning creates a core difference…

Men are taught accountability as honor, while women are taught agreeableness as survival. One gender is hardened by consequences; the other is softened by excuses.

As men, we find ourselves bonded over shared struggle. Women bond over shared sentiment. Accountability disrupts sentiment.

Do you see the point I’m making here?

A woman can gain 50 pounds, spiral into emotional chaos, commodify her sex life, and she'll still be handed a microphone, exclusive podcast invites, a magazine cover, or a brand deal, all in the name of “empowerment.”

The bar for what’s celebrated has dropped so low that it's now applauding what once would’ve been called trauma responses. Once, we sought to overcome trauma. Now we brand it, monetize it, and demand validation for never letting it go.

• Make impulsive sexual choices?

• Turn every red flag into a personality trait? - put it on a tote bag and call it empowerment?

• Sell access to your body for $5.99?

• Date a felon for the thrill? - Call it “healing your inner child”?

• Broadcast your abortion like it’s a skincare routine?

• Ghost six guys in a row? - label it “protecting your peace”?

You’re brave. You’re bold. You’re empowered.

Never mind the emotional fallout, the numbness, the inability to form deep connections.

As long as it trends, it thrives. When poor decisions are rewarded with attention, they don’t stop; they metastasize.

Modern culture has created a dangerous double bind, praise women endlessly for their independence, but never hold them accountable for their choices. The rise of individualism has led to an erosion of personal responsibility, especially when that responsibility threatens self-image. A woman sleeping with 500+ men is simply a symptom of her knowing there will be little consequences and other trogaldytes cheering her on.

A little girl who can cry her way out of consequences becomes a woman who believes every emotional reaction deserves justification. Meanwhile, boys are conditioned early to "man up" and take ownership. This disparity becomes a blueprint for adulthood. It explains why women can blow up relationships, blame patriarchy, and still be applauded for their "growth.

The modern woman isn’t being held accountable because they are rewarded and encouraged to ignore accountability altogether. And so, a cycle begins…

• Make choices that erode your well-being.

• Gaslight yourself into believing it’s “liberating.”

• Get online applause for it.

Repeat.

We don’t call it what it is, self-destruction, with good lighting. Instead, we stamp it with buzzwords like “body positivity,” “sex-positivity,” or “financial empowerment.” To rebrand it and somehow make it palpable to mainstream society. And they’ve taken the bait!

OnlyFans, casual hookup culture, and performative promiscuity have turned female sexuality into something marketable, fragmented, and hollow. And it’s not just the explicit stuff. Women curate thirst-trap accounts, hint at sexual availability, and subtly monetize attention, all while pretending it’s no big deal.

But when sex becomes a product, the soul becomes collateral.

People will do anything, no matter how absurd, to avoid facing their own souls.

• Carl Jung

The women selling their bodies aren’t in control; they’re enslaved by the same men they think they’ve outwitted. You’re not a boss babe. You’re a digital waitress serving depravity, hoping for tips.

Why would capitalism criticize its best customers?

Women.

It’s not a conspiracy, it’s economics. Women drive over 85% of consumer purchasing decisions in the U.S. (Forbes, 2023).

So media, marketing, and even local news outlets aren’t incentivized to criticize women. Accountability doesn’t sell beauty products. Shame doesn’t move ad space.

Instead, we’ve built a multi-billion-dollar industry around telling women they’re perfect as they are, even when they aren’t. That’s emotional consumerism.

The Annoying Twats Who Made It A “Gender Study” or Historical Discourse

Then you have people who want to make my article a boring ChatGPT gender study and always go back to the same old, tired, tried, and tested argument of “cause men”. “Patriarchy” “systemic” blah blah, blah blah. These modern parrots act like saying “patriarchy” is a mic drop. Newsflash, it’s just pseudo-intellectual glitter covering lazy thinking. At this point, blaming men is less of an argument and more of a nervous tourette like tic, where they gotta find some way to insert it.

A woman choosing to exploit herself, and now it’s “sexual trauma”.

Ah, yes, the academic word salad tossed with a side of moral superiority.

Let me guess, this dork (above) read half of bell hooks, skimmed a Tumblr thread from 2018, and now feels qualified to hand out naughty philosophical spankings to anyone who doesn’t genuflect to your gender theory gospel?

Pointing out that some women are voluntarily monetizing their sexuality in ways that affect men, relationships, and culture is not "upholding the Madonna/Whore complex"it's noticing. That thing people do with their eyes open and their brain turned on.

Their argument boils down to…

“If a woman exploits herself, blame the patriarchy. If a man critiques it, he’s the problem. Empathy now!”

The same busted rusty old ideological vending machine. Insert trauma, dispense moral immunity.

WE AIN’T GOING FOR THAT SHIT ANYMORE.

Also, “Gender is a construct designed for self-continuation.”

Did you just quote Foucault with the energy of someone who thinks deodorant is capitalist propaganda? Look, I'm all for complexity, but complexity isn’t an excuse to avoid accountability. Especially when we're talking about people making very public choices and then crying foul when those choices are judged by... the public.

If they can sell it and make a sizable amount of money off it, I can critique it however the fuck I want. Victims-turned-influencers who call every critique "misogyny" and every consequence "patriarchal violence." They are becoming a dying breed, most of which we see right through.

Ah, yes, the “historical oppression means we should now sprint face-first into nihilism” argument. Classic.

So let's have it right, they think, because bad things used to happen to bodies, your solution is to treat them like expired coupons now? Because slavery existed, now it's open season on self-respect? Because the church once overreached, the logical response is... monetized overexposure? And bruv, nobody’s trying to turn the dial back to “dark ages.” We’re just wondering if maybe, just maybe, broadcasting your coochie for tokens isn’t the apex of progress.

You say, “I’d rather live in a world where someone sleeps with 583 men.” That tells me all I need to know about you.

Some Rare People Got The Message and Knew Better

A lot of People resorted to Ad hominem attacks.

Prototypical for people who have an opposing view but don’t have the mental processing skills to come back with a semi-decent argument.

Cause you can’t!? How on earth can any rational human, man or woman, defend a woman trying to sleep with 500+ men in a day and filming it!? How? Not all acts deserve defense; some just need distance.

(Ooohhh burn)

Just block me, you coward. Instead, you just had to be seen as such an A-Class pearl clutcher, so you just HAD to comment.

If it’s close-minded to object to a woman sleeping with 500+ people, then sure. We’re pleasantly close-minded.

Yes, “his women”, “Her man”. Sometimes it’s not to be taken as literally ownership you pretentious moron. Do you object to people saying HIS wife, or HER husband, too? Jesus christ when did people become so fucking baby lotion, soft? They have as much backbone as a bowl of Miracle Whip.

Look at this person's logic. Because I called out the insane behavior of a woman glamorizing sleeping with 500+ men = I hate women. The saaammmme tired argument of "if you criticize anything a woman does, you must hate women" argument served with a side of emotional blackmail and a sprinkle of Bible Belt projection. Cute.

You say these women were “lured” in. When will women ever hold other women accountable for making shitty decisions? Women can’t perpetually be victims all the time. It’s such a cop out. Using terms like “lured,” “groomed,” or “manipulated” can be valid in predatory contexts. But when applied to adult women choosing and making fully informed and conscious choices, it erases personal responsibility.

“They were groomed, but also empowered, but also traumatized, but also shouldn’t be judged, but also are warning others.” Pick one.

You don’t get to wear a victim badge and an empowerment crown at the same time without people calling out the costume change.

I’m not shaming women.

I’m shaming bullsh*t. There's a difference.

If your defense of these women is “well, society made them do it,” then congrats, you just admitted it’s a bad idea. You want to protect women? Stop applauding the cliff they're dancing on and start telling the truth about the fall, you donut.

There’s a lot of annoying, pedantic writing snobs on Substack. “You’re not an author”.

Things are changing.

The world isn’t being won by writers with the cleanest grammar, it’s being won by the ones who actually say something.

You can string together ten-dollar words, quote Derrida, and write like you're auditioning for a think tank... but if no one feels what you wrote, you didn’t write anything.

You just arranged syllables like a scared little boy hiding behind a thesaurus. A New York Times bestseller doesn’t make you a good writer any more than owning a scalpel makes you a surgeon. (Those things are lobbied for anyway.) And sniffing down your nose at creators who resonate with real people who speak with grit, blood, humor, and heart doesn’t elevate you. It exposes you.

You're not an artist. You're an insecure gatekeeper trying to preserve a club that no one wants to join anymore.

Fuck your “journalism”. Most of you are biased jerk-offs anyway.

A writer who hides behind complexity is like a chef who plates garbage with tweezers, looks impressive until you taste it.

New media doesn’t care about your tenure.

It cares about truth.

People subscribe to those who get them. Who bleed like they do. Who lives in the same chaos.

Who can actually solve a problem, not just analyze it to death in 8,000 academic words that say nothing.

So to the snobbish, scholar-core writers/readers still preaching from their ivory keyboards.

📜 Your era’s over.

Grow a spine. Say what you mean. Speak like a man, not a footnote.

I write like my tribe needs to hear it. Not like your professor needs to grade it. Nobody remembers the best-written book. They remember the one that bled when they needed it most.

“She’s A Victim”

This woman is literally playing in our face, bragging about how many men she tried to sleep with, and people are still stupid enough to say she’s a victim.

This cultural immunity isn’t accidental. It has become a very systemic, slow burn.

The legal system, media narratives, and social media have created a feedback loop that rewards women for framing themselves as victims. According to Pew Research, women are more likely to be believed in interpersonal conflicts, especially in domestic disputes. While men face consequences for emotional reactions, women often walk away with sympathy, even if they sparked the fire.

And here lies the problem…

If accountability is always optional, growth becomes impossible. Empowerment in its truest sense demands ownership.

Let’s talk about what we now glorify under the name of liberation…

• Public abortion celebrations

• OnlyFans success stories

• "Hot girl summer" is a lifestyle, not a joke

• Weaponizing social media to manipulate partners

Modern culture hands women a blank check to chase pleasure in all forms, emotionally, sexually, even spiritually, while men are taxed with accountability for decades-old offenses they never committed. As Dr. Anna Lembke explains in Dopamine Nation, unchecked indulgence doesn’t liberate it hollows. And we wonder why the connection feels broken.

Often the victim midnset is mentioned by women as men value truth. Women value social harmony.Men respect the guy who says, “I messed up.” Women gravitate toward the girl who says, “You’re not the problem, he was just intimidated.”

One creates accountability. The other creates comfort.

When women punish each other, it’s rarely direct. It’s social ostracizing, gossip, subtle sabotage. The goal isn’t clarity it’s control without confrontation. And this bleeds into relationships.

To keep the peace, many women avoid truth. But a peace built on denial is just conflict delayed.

It’s simply a nicer thing if you say she’s a victim.

The Random People Obsessed with Semantics

It was so weird. People kept saying.

“She didn’t SLEEP with anyone!!! Call it what it is”.

For fuck sake. Are people this dense? When I say someone is sleeping with someone, “Slept with” is a euphemism. It’s a socially accepted, softer way of referencing sex, especially in writing or conversation. It’s not meant to be literal. Nobody thinks two adults just napped fully clothed in respectful silence.

Idiots.

The outrage comes from people who either want to control language or are too literal for their own good. I’ll write whatever I want, I’ll curse when I want. I’ll decide not to curse when I want. And if you don’t like it, block me, bitch. Sometimes I want to be crass, juvenile, and rude. Sometimes I want to be smooth, charming, and clever. And sometimes I want to be brash, brutal, and unrelenting. That’s duality. I write for people who feel the same way. Not bitch ass readers who can’t wait to clutch their pearls.

Respectfully.

If you don’t like it.

Suck my dick.

So yes, we say “slept with.” Not because we’re in denial, but because we have the vocabulary of a functioning adult who knows how to speak like a human being, not a YouTube comment section.

If your worldview is so fragile that euphemisms threaten it, maybe go scream “copulation!” into a pillow and come back when you’ve calmed down.

When Accountability Happens, It’ll Be Too Late

Rarely, rarely, a woman will own her actions, much like Annie Knight and the damn fools who support her.

But it often comes after the damage is done, a divorce, a breakup, a medical crisis, or watching someone else move on and thrive.

To the women reading this…

Your strength doesn’t come from always being right. It comes from owning when you’re wrong. The men who love you aren’t looking for perfection, they’re looking for honesty.

To the men…

Stop accepting performative apologies and emotional manipulation. Hold the line. Because a relationship without accountability isn’t love, it’s a negotiation with someone’s ego.

Your peace is worth the truth.